One of the wonderful things about human beings is that we can you know you give love and you get more it’s kind of like the exact reverse of money and credit is like that right so if you give credit to other people and you explain how clever they were and how inspiring their work was to you then that doesn’t make you look bad at all so obviously don’t be sick of Fanta Q no don’t say you know you’re probably my reviewer so I’m going to say really nice things about you but just just you know express your heart right if you if you feel good about a paper because it really was inspiring to you just take a moment to say it was an inspiring paper you know it was it was seminal it really led to a lot for you say that and and that you know that of course makes them feel good but it makes it it brings credit to the whole field. Find out more about language writing¬† styles on¬†Edusson.

I think okay the other thing of course is when you’re talking about related work and comparisons is that computer science is a very multi-dimensional subject right you know up even you’re just thinking about programs they may run faster they may be they may be they may run in less space they may be simpler to understand or more complicated to understand they may be written in you know some suitable language or run in certain environments so it’s very very multi-dimensional it’s very rare to find that your work is sort of better in every dimension than somebody else’s right so what you don’t want to do is to say is to just focus on the areas where you’re better you say well that’ll an X and I’m better and why and what Palio that I’m actually not so good on that right so because what you want to avoid is your viewers saying the authors appear to be unaware that their system is completely hopeless when applied to Zed right.

That’s a bad thing for a reviewer to be able to say it’s quite disarming if you say of course our system really doesn’t work in situations ed well at all you better use some other system for that it’s very difficult to make something that’s brilliant at everything okay so it’s not just honesty and good scholarship it’s actually disarming and and you know it helpful for readers if you explain where your not so good as well as where you’re great because how I sense so it’s actually it’s easy you just gotta tell the way it is I mean yeah when you tear that weaknesses at the end of the related work so in your later work section you’re saying here are these other things and you can do a sort of comparative evaluation I mean either as you go along or maybe at the end you could say weaknesses of our approach or something but somewhere towards the end yeah yes and try to avoid the kind of related work section that says brown and white did X green and blue did this and sort of one sentence about each that more or less is no more than a list of citations but doesn’t give any value judgment you might not even have read the paper.